Відео

There are voices that the main reason for the lack of flights to the moon is that no one has actually landed on it yet.

It's acceptable to spend Apollo levels of money and more on endless War. We're losing our imagination and moral courage.

Answer: They faked it.

Quintessence of the video: "Basically, if we were led by Louis XIV, we would be having brunch on Mars right now"

Okay, what happened to the story that NASA lost all of the technology and can’t get it back. Also the Van Allen belts problem?

I don't believe we ever went to the moon! Whenever you put "Money" and "Politics" together you have a lot of dishonesty, lies, and deception.

We never went there in the first place! It's all BS!

It's not difficult, it's just very expensive and we have no real reason to expend so much money for no tangible return.

Becouse they never did how you pass van allan belt and live so many years wealthy with so many radiation out there .simple one more lie rememder was cold war times

Long story short... how to make a better Gordian Knot.🙄

In the 60s the work was done by real men who were not confused about whether they were men or not. They didn't have tantrums because the $8 cup of coffee was 1 degree to hot or cold. Like it or not, that world was built by PROPER MEN.

It's expensive. If the cost is not justified, why bother?

I really believed in the moon landings when i was a kid. My Mother and Father even let us watch it at 4 in the morning, i'm British, and i was only 7 years old, so my parents could say i actually saw it on TV as it happened . Now i don't belive. After thinking about it and watching vids by people like Jarra Whitean his moon faker series of videos, i don't buy into the narrative any more. Even NASA's own video says that they are going to have to solve the problems of going through the Van Halen belts, didn't they have to go through them with apollo?, and the other vid by them that says they got rid of the plans. Did the Wright brothers destroy all their data. No, im sorry but I'll belive it when i see it. Stick with the unmanned craft. Seems much safer and reliable.

Nice history lesson. History has nothing to do with getting back to the moon.

Can you imagine being this guy’s parents when he was young? “Hey son, why didn’t you finish your homework?” 1 x 10 to the 20th excuse and one week later…

I saw Buzz Aldrin speak for an hour here in NZ in 2010 about his experience ON the Moon and in space and Neil Armstrong said it would be harder to fake than to succeed... I look forward to human beings back on the Moon👍🚀🇳🇿

Tbh, seeing the footages of all those 70s moon landings, they all seemed very fake to me.

There is absolutely no reason to go to the moon. Keep in mind America’s landing was a political statement made possible by superior technical achievement. Soviet's were ahead until we successfully performed rendezvous in the Gemini program. Future of our space program is, as seen with Mars rovers, is interplanetary exploration with robotics. It solves all problems with manned flight, food, water, oxygen, mental and physical health.

When President Kennedy was assassinated, his pledge to go to the moon became a tribute to his memory as well.

Money is problem? Then why are we not exploiting all the galaxy has to offer then 😂😂. Shii just merge nasa with space force n collect dat military money

Because you never went there in the first place, just like India didn’t do you remember that video India made a mockery of everything you tried to do

Good afternoon Ben, Did you hear the kind words spoken in regards to you from Mr. Claridge @ Thunderbolts Projects earlier today?

Now all these testing and spending look like somebody try to make as much money they can for his pocet insted to take all serious and send crew on the moon

But, BlackHoles do not exist. Fairytale theoreticals. Positive and negative charges moving create a magnetic field. Magnetic fields do not exist independently of electrical flows.

Because we never went to the moon in the first place it was all a lie

290 billion is nothing compared to what uSA spend on military each year

24:00 I don't buy any of these excuses. The moon is the most important military base. Period. There might be a set of factors that the public is not told. Commentors are mentioning the current wars, in September 2018 we had the FED preventing the collapse of the banking system, there are so many examples of waste, everyone knows the nature of fiat money, so it's trite to remind viewers of that issue. Professor Sizemore et al have already shown the trillions sucked into a black hole on dark projects.

When will FINALLY achieve fusion power? Until we learn to build gravity generators, never. Fusion reactions in ordinary gravity are NOT self-sustaining, otherwise known as "chain reactions." All of the reactions we use today ARE chain reactions. We have been struggling to make electromagnetism do the job that gravity does in the stars, but I do not believe that will ever happen. The research will continue because too many politically well connected academics are making their living from the research, but I do not see a way for any of their approaches to ever work. So, with no means of generating intense gravitational fields, fusion is not in our future. We would be far better off spending money on cleaner and safer fission plants, probably plants built around the use of thorium as an initial feedstock.

19:49 1. We could just ship it all out and subcontract it all to China, after apologizing to them for not allowing them to participate in the international space station. Before you dismiss it as a bad joke, we can ask them to build housing throughout America, as an extension of Belt and Road initiative. 2. When we get back to the moon, for laughs, we should tell the public that it's really the first time we went there. But not before then.

Why is it so hard to return to the moon? cause WE NEVER WENT TO BEGIN WITH

16:26 This idea of doling out subcontracts to almost every state was led by Orrin Hatch, and the blame should be his for that O-ring disaster, they would not be needed if the pork didn't need to be spread out thusly. That's my private source, high level.

Rockets are not even close to the most complicated inventions; I defer to the physicists and other scientists to elaborate on that one. Fluid dynamics, at least in the mid 20th century, and I can think of many other ideas...

8:37 I had read 25-30 years ago, that China was committed to spending 10% of their GDP on sports alone. That explains some of their successes, diving, chess, ... The price argument falls flat as the comments show.

because you never went there ... fu

Professor Jim Fetzer has an archive with photos that explain in excruciating detail the thesis that we didn't go to the moon. What boggles the mind is the number of photos of high quality taken on the moon, without the budgeted time to do so, remember, these were customized cameras requiring focus and the men had thick gloves on, etc. There were more problems than that, I'm simplifying into the most basic bottleneck. We are left with the intermediate theory, we went there but faked the photos. On some Apollo missions, you'd have to take on average one photo of high quality about every 60 seconds while you were there... the other missions, almost that frequent... get the idea?

Let's "lose interest" in welfare. How about that, hm?

New rockets cost less that the Saturn V? BS! The real reason is that NASA went well out of its way to destroy all the drawings for the Saturn V. I do not know what caused them to make that decision, but if we wanted to build a copy, it would have be redesigned in its entirety at current rates.

Not a well researched production.

You might wanna actually check NASA's yearly budget now vs. during APOLLO, rather than just % of US budget. NASA gets more money now than during Apollo, they just waste it!

biden spends All the money on foreign countries, none left for America! ...America Last with him.

One day in the future, I need to interview 90% of the idiots that think we went to the Moon after it is admtited as a hoax. And these 90% of the idiots will all give sheepish reply.

If somebody designed and built the Eagle Lander today and took it to NASA, they would tell them to go away and stop being stupid. There isn't an health and safety inspector alive who would sign off on that risk assessment.

Just make the government stand aside, get NASA out of the way, to hell with the DEI rules, and let SpaceX do it all.

What resources are on the moon that we need?

It is so hard because we didn't go to the Moon yet.

Price, Politics. . . and Diversity. Diversity is the biggest of the poorly chosen "priorities." Including people who can't really do their jobs because of their protected minority status.

Imagine what we could do if we didn't just blow over 100billion dollars on a lost cause like Ukraine and we gave it to NASA.

Ted Cruz is the Zodiac.

Because we want to go in a way that we can sustain going and build.

Don't worry on mars there is a rover and a drone , only 1000 times far away of the moon